Here Come the Sun King

Why did the Beatles make so many references within their work to famous doubles and doppelgangers? Next in the “Doubles and Doppelgangers” series we have a pretty obvious reference to King Louis XIV within the song “Here Come the Sun King” from the Beatles infamous Abbey Road album.

Portrait of Louis XIV (1638-1715) as Jupiter conquering the Fronde

Louis XIV was known as the Sun King. He was a monarch of the House of Bourbon who ruled as King of France from 1643 until his death. His reign of 72 years and 110 days is the longest of any monarch of a major country in European history.

Over his lifetime, Louis commissioned numerous works of art to portray himself, among them over 300 formal portraits. The earliest portrayals of Louis already followed the pictorial conventions of the day in depicting the child king as the majestically royal incarnation of France. This idealization of the monarch continued in later works, which avoided depictions of the effect of the smallpox that Louis contracted in 1647. In the 1660s, Louis began to be shown as a Roman emperor, the god Apollo, Alexander the Great, or as Jupiter as in the painting above.

The Man in the Iron Mask


The most popular of all the legends regarding this prisoner pertains to his lineage. It has been said that The Man in the Iron Mask, was the son of Anne of Austria and Cardinal Mazarin, and therefore an illegitimate half-brother of King Louis XIV, an idea transformed into a book by Alexandre Dumas called “The Vicomte de Bragelonne”. However, the book introduced a substantial change: he made the prisoner an identical twin of Louis XIV. The story goes on to say that the man was kept hidden because of his rights to the throne. Twins were a threat to orderly succession, but no one could kill a prince of royal blood, so the second twin was masked and imprisoned.  The novel, written in 1847 portrays Dumas’s famous characters- the 3 Musketeers- D’Artagnan, Aramis, Porthos, and Athos. In this sequel, their lives are tracked many years after the moment when D’Artagnan receives a commission to be a lieutenant in the Musketeers. We find in The Man in the Iron Mask that things have changed quite a bit from the seeming happy days of swashbuckling adventures.

The story opens at a French prison known as the Bastille. A priest named Aramis – a former Musketeer – is sitting in a cell with the prisoner.  Aramis is at the prison to hear the man’s confession. However his confession is lacking due to his only crime being the King of France’s twin brother. Aramis happens to be one of the few people in France who knows this secret. Aramis wastes no time in putting together a plan to free this prisoner and swap him for the legitimate king.

Later in the story, the King is replaced by the freed prisoner, Philippe, the twin brother of Louis XIV- The Sun King. The real King gets thrown into the Bastille, and Philippe morphs into his new royal role.

Voltaire, who was a prisoner at Bastille in 1717, claimed that he had learned things from former servants of the masked prisoner during his time there. He wrote that the Man in the Iron Mask had been wearing the mask as far back as at least 1661. He also said that he was tall, handsome and played the guitar. He wrote again about him later, saying that he was about 60 at the time of his death. This letter seems to align accordingly with the twin brother legend, however most of the stories told and legend which ensued is based upon speculation and hearsay.
I know another legend based mostly on speculation and hearsay….. 😉
So many doubles… so little time!
To Be Continued….




Sources and citations:



  1. Diz: I’m rather slow in assimilating your argument but you are convincing me that something is going on and that something centers on McCartney.

    McCartney and Mal Evans trip to Kenya is certainly unusual. Yet there must be medical records.

    It would seem to me that a voice analysis that could easily be done would provide proof positive that McCartney I and McCartney II are identical or not.

    I never listened to the Beatles, McCartney or Lennon but I see no reason why McCartney II would have the same occult interests as Lennon and McCartney I. I suppose opinions on those interests would have been rife in Hamburg.

    What I did hear of Wings seemed much less interesting than McCartney I and the Beatles.

    If you have listened carefully to the songs of I and II can you detect any difference in wording, song style or content?

    From the Letterman interview it seems clear that McCartney II is not interesting in solving the problem but wishes to mystify it.

    My preliminary thoughts, but I am going to have to work through your essays more thoroughly before I can come to any conclusions.

    A problem is that the Sgt. Pepper’s cover by the Fool was settled. Their cover was, in fact, a dud. Fraser convinced McCartney that the Fool cover was a dud. As I see it the artists came up with this Sgt. Pepper’s concept. As the concept involves aspects of the Beatles that if Blake and wife, Fraser et al. knew should have been private to McCartney and the Beatles how did they know it?

    It would have been McCartney II providing the information since McCartney I was already dead and buried. I find that improbable and contradictory.

    The cover explanation needs a more comprehensive development although I am in sympathy with your ideas.


    1. I agree wholeheartedly. I continue to analyze and try to understand. It’s a mystery… That’s why I am still here! It has yet to be solved.
      I can say for certain SOMETHING is amiss… What that is- so far your guess is as good as mine.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s